The Ugly Side of Disney’s Pop Princess Machine

Recently, Disney pop princess Miley Cyrus performed at the Teen Choice Awards. Dlisted has a full range of pictures and video. Watching the video and looking at the pictures, makes one wonder about Disney’s formerly sure touch in manufacturing (and discarding) tween appealing pop princesses. Has Disney hit the bottom of the well, and must resort to pandering to the worst instincts of it’s tween audience figuring their parents won’t be involved? Or is Disney simply unable to execute it’s strategy, with any level of coherence, as key executives burn out and are replaced by lesser figures. Either way, we are likely to see both a flashpoint in general between angry, and economically stressed parents, and the ugly exploitation behind Disney’s Pop Princess-Making machine.

First, Miley Cyrus at the Teen Choice Awards (yes it’s a stripper pole on top of an ice cream cart):

[click Picture to enlarge]

And her nine year old sister, Noah, at the party thrown by the Teen Choice Awards:

Disney has been very good in the past at extracting lots of money from parents of “tween” (ages eight to twelve) girls by pushing a series of (highly disposable as they age) Pop Princesses. From Lindsay Lohan (“Herbie Fully Loaded,” Hillary Duff (“Lizzie McGuire”), Melissa Joan Hart (“Clarissa Explains it All”), Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Vanessa Hudgens (“High School the Musical”), Demi Lovato (“Camp Rock”), and Selena Gomez, to of course Miley Cyrus, a common theme runs through the characters Disney creates. An “ordinary girl” who is of course far prettier than an ordinary teen age girl, between the ages of 13 and 16, discovers life outside her sheltered family, as a secret wizard or witch, princess, or pop star (no it doesn’t make sense — it’s for kids). Girls eight to twelve have reliably consumed this basic princess fantasy, since 1991 and “Clarissa Explains It All” on Nickelodeon. Variations include actual pop princesses (Spears and Aguilera on “the New Mickey Mouse Club”) and ordinary-girl/pop princesses hybrids such as Miley Cyrus on “Hannah Montana.”

As recent as 2007, Cyrus’s concert ticket sales and album sales netted her $64 million, and #11 on Billboard’s top earners, higher than Faith Hill and Bon Jovi. Tween girls love pop princesses, and Disney has excelled in giving them what they want. Disney’s only concern is — tween girls don’t make their own money or buying decisions, their parents do. Sadly, Disney has always had a seamy side to the pop princess machine.

First, there’s the issue of disposability. Girls age out of appealing to tweens, when they get too “old” which generally happens around 16-17 or so, and no longer become fantasy figures of pre-adolescents (the way say, Superman or Captain Marvel is for young boys) but rather “near adults” that tweens find harder to identify with (presumably because of overt sexual issues and looming adulthood). Most of the Disney princesses know from past experience with other girls, their shelf-life approaches that of the average NFL career: four years. Indeed, Hillary Duff, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Vanessa Hudgens, and others all started to make their transitions out of tween roles at around age seventeen or so. Some with more success (and happiness) than others. Every girl (and her management/agents) knows that her time as a Disney pop princess is limited, and as such her transition to adult roles must be fairly rapid. Hence the built-in incentives for the pop princesses in transition to act “adult” or take on adult roles as rapidly as possible.

Second, the business itself can be seamy. Teen star Lindsay Lohan famously spun out of control. Britney Spears was famously, briefly institutionalized. Sister Jamie Lynn Spears was pregnant at 16, while starring in “Zoey 101” for Nickelodeon. Rumors (never proven) had it that the responsible party was not the named, 19 year old boyfriend, but a Disney exec. Either way, the end result is not particularly wholesome family fare. Some Disney Pop Princesses and actresses come out alright. These tend to be the smarter, more driven, and more lucky (in that they have functional families looking out for them). But far too many end up with serious problems for Disney to be entirely comfortable.

It’s hard to fathom the thinking of Disney execs who while not directly controlling the Teen Choice Awards, certainly have a say in how their principal star acts, allowed negative images to be created. In the age of cell phone cameras, any negative image (and audio, as Michael Richards found out) will be publicized. There simply is not any hiding any more. Cyrus may be their biggest star, and best earner, but the danger in hard economic times is that parents will simply pull the plug on cable TV (and thus, earnings for Nickelodeon which still gets the bulk of its revenue from subscriber fees). Moreover, parents can cut back or simply eliminate Disney purchases for tweens. Which are, at their core, discretionary spending.

It’s possible, that Disney execs either did not wish to alienate Cyrus’s management, or deliberately encouraged or at least said nothing to discourage, Cyrus from adopting an “overly sexy” performance in an attempt to prolong her earnings power by appealing to older girls, who would as 14-16 year olds find the more solidly adolescent Cyrus a more appealing figure. This would be likely if the launch of new “replacement stars” Lovato and Gomez came up duds.

If this was the case, and it might not be, then Disney execs would be incapable of seeing the danger. The sky-high earnings and popularity of Cyrus guarantee that any possible mis-step will be reported in the press. Probably the video and particularly that of nine year old Noah Cyrus playing around with her friends on the stripper pole in a party aimed at kids and early teens are incendiary for parents. Parents, as a general rule, do not like at all sexualization of children, and negative role models for girls particularly when the words “stripper pole” are involved. Disney was lucky to sweep Jamie Lynn Spears pregnancy (whoever the father) into the memory hole, in good times when parents did not quibble over spending $100 a ticket for Miley Cyrus concerts if it made their 10 year old daughter happy.

Those good times are gone, unlikely to come back, and even if they do, spending habits are likely to be permanently changed (in favor of thrift). Chris Rock had a reputedly hilarious routine about keeping his daughter off the stripper pole. Anger at inappropriate sexualization (aimed at, after all, girls eight to twelve) coupled with discretionary spending at the minimum, means parents have much less slack they will allow companies like Disney.

Any of the explanations are disturbing: Disney seeking to extend Cyrus’s run as a money-maker by appealing to older girls with a “sexy” image ala “Gossip Girl,” execs fearful of alienating the star and her family/management, or execs simply clueless and unaware of the changing morality caused by hard times. Whatever the reason, Disney seems as unable to chart a course in the recession as any other media company, disturbing since allegedly Disney was one of the better run companies, with savvier executives.

About whiskeysplace

Conservative blogger focusing on culture, business, technology, and how they intersect.
This entry was posted in children, culture, disney, more, princesses, sexualization. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The Ugly Side of Disney’s Pop Princess Machine

  1. Add Vanessa Hudgens to the list of former Disney pop princesses who've had a bumpy transition to adulthood – she likes posing for "candid" photographs wearing nothing but a smile.Peter

  2. OneSTDV says:

    It's possible they're trying to transition Cyrus. With Britney, her handlers never even tried the subtle/girl next door approach, dressing her in a provocative school girl outfit in her first video. She was the slutty girl next door who almost never wore clothes covering her midsection.Britney's early career was just one big tease for 14 year old boys (and their fathers, let's be honest). Even her first album cover looks straight off one of those jailbait sites 'agnostic' goes to.

  3. Whiskey says:

    OneSTDV — Wasn't Spears, Aguilera, and the rest on the "New Mickey Mouse Club" fairly wholesome, i.e. standard Nickelodeon fare?Too true on Britney being "provocative" in her solo career.Iron/peter — Good point on Hudgens. Dane Cook made fun of that propensity for "candids' carefully leaked to gain publicity (and presumably more adult roles). The Disney Machine in its inner workings is fairly sordid.

  4. showhank says:

    Saw this and thought of you

  5. njartist says:

    Whiskey:I suggest spending an hour or two researching Disney and MKULTRA/ Monarch mind control: apparently Disney was a big contributor to creating mind controlled slaves among its stars.The following site does a good analysis of the Cyrus family: fact Brittany Spears is a controlled person.The purpose of such child stars is to sexualize and debase children.

  6. Anonymous says:

    I think that they keep the official products "clean", and then encourage the girls to be "dirty" offscreen. So Dad won't walk in and see Hannah Montana making out with a 20 year old on the beach, but Little Sarah sees it on the internet and knows what's going on. That's a big part of the appeal.Cyrus is interesting because she's the first to have a really successful TV/movie and music career. I think it's more that Disney has mastered the formula than that Cyrus has any particular innate talent. The "country dad" definitely helps break through to some families who might be resistant.Her days are definitely numbered, though. She's just too untalented to sustain a career as an adult. Her best bet is to milk the pop-singer gig for another year or two and then step gracefully aside and be a "professional celebrity" for a while. If she disappears and learns a craft, she could maybe distance herself enough from the Hannah Montana image to have a semi-serious career.

  7. OneSTDV says:

    "OneSTDV — Wasn't Spears, Aguilera, and the rest on the "New Mickey Mouse Club" fairly wholesome, i.e. standard Nickelodeon fare?"Yes but when I think of Spears and Aguilera, I think of them entirely as solo artists. The Mickey Mouse Club was merely a show. Disney had no intention of creating a brand off of the show like they have done with Duff, Cyrus, and others. I believe Britney was signed with Jive Records early in her career, so it wasn't a Disney venture.

  8. ERM says:

    An "ordinary girl" who is of course far prettier than an ordinary teen age girl, between the ages of 13 and 16, discovers life outside her sheltered family, as a secret wizard or witch, princess, or pop star (no it doesn't make sense — it's for kids). Girls eight to twelve have reliably consumed this basic princess fantasy, since 1991 and "Clarissa Explains It All" on Nickelodeon.Wow, that's the worst summary of "Clarissa" I could possibly imagine. Girl was a tomboy in overalls with a loser boy best friend who spent most of her time in her room geeking out on her PC. Perhaps you are conflating with "Sabrina the Teenage Witch"?

  9. OldSouth says:

    I'm no big consumer of pop culture, and neither were my kids. So, just to keep myself informed, I decided to watch some footage of a 'Hannah Montana' live concert, broadcast by our satellite provider.I couldn't stay with it more than about five minutes, and I really did make the attempt.I just kept blurting out: 'This is kiddie porn! This is kiddie porn! What are they thinking??'So, I'm unsurprised, if saddened, to see thirty seconds of last week's proceedings with Miss Cyrus.This is kiddie porn.What are they thinking?

  10. What are they thinking? I'll tell you what. We are witnessing an entire generational cohort of parents who have absorbed–as if by osmosis–the entire "sex drugs and rock and roll" scene as the "normal, normal" societal experience while growing up themselves. And thus see nothing instinctively out of place when their 14 yr old daughters dress (if not exactly act) like street-walkers as they trapse out the door to an unchaperoned rave–even as the parents simultaneously –with no irony evident whatsoever–bemoan all the negative influences of modern society when their daughters become pregnant or hooked on drugs.

  11. kneedick says:

    Um, Disney is a Jewish operation to pornify and Africanize young White girls.See:BritneyXtinaMileySo this is no coincidence, but by design.Basically, the content changed after Jews hijacked it – just like when BET got bought by Sumner Murray Rothstein.

Comments are closed.