Chicks Dig Jerks, Version 5,799


Chicks dig jerks. Sad, but true. The most beautiful women often choose the most jerky of men. Including violent, dangerous men. the Daily Mail has a story of another woman, killed by an ex-boyfriend/husband. Laura Ackerson, 27, was found dismembered in a creek, 1,200 miles from her North Carolina home. Her ex-boyfriend and his new wife have been charged with the crime.

This is nothing new. You can find an example of brutal murder of a young (or not so young) woman by a husband, boyfriend, or ex of that category any day of the week, in any major metropolitan area. The question is, why? The standard feminist answer is, that all men are scum, and evil, and murderous killers of women. The more accurate answer is that violent behavior even directed towards women is a turn on. As Theodore Dalyrmple noted, in “Life at the Bottom,” but did not address fully, women prefer mostly violent men, even his educated, professional nurses. They’d stick by men who would physically abuse and humiliate them. Why? Because they craved that violent dominance.

It is the role of any society to rein in, control, and harness properly sexuality. Because un-channeled sex is destructive. We don’t want 13 year olds having sex, even though biologically it is possible. We as a society understand the great harm, not just to the child involved but society as a whole, when that happens. We take great effort to shield adolescents from sexual activity, or at least society used to (that effort is under continual assault by Hollywood’s leftists).

In the same manner, female preference for dark, dangerous, bad boys was usually not a problem, because older women, aunts, mothers, grandmothers, co-workers, neighbors, etc. had a hand in reining that behavior in. Don’t be stupid, don’t be slutty, don’t make a mistake, don’t ruin your life. Desire is what it is, but control over primal urges for women roughly paralleled the teachings over desire pushed by adult men for boys: be a man, straighten up, hold your horses, be stronger than your desire, avoid the bad girls, be a gentleman, etc.

One wonders who a guy like the accused, managed to have a kid with a very attractive woman, and then marry another woman, who while not looking good in her mugshot, is probably hotter than any office nerd beta male intermittent girlfriend. The answer of course is obvious. It was the danger and brutality itself that attracted the women in the first place.

That’s just unsustainable in the long-run. A society cannot run on women, bad boys, and illegitimate kids. Most beta males, around 99.999999% of them won’t do anything harmful. They just won’t work. They won’t go around shooting kids on some youth retreat. But they will do the absolute minimum at their jobs. Why should they work hard? To give over taxes to this guy’s kids:

Or maybe this woman’s kids:

You cannot get blood from a stone. Ultimately wealth is created, for things like health care, good roads, clean water to drink, safe food to eat, power flowing through the grid, by beta males. No they are not sexy, but they keep the lights on. All over the West, the lights are going out. Not just light-bulb bans (which is part of the delusion that you can mandate “sexiness’ and not pay a concrete price) but the society that produces light bulbs. America and the West are doomed to be miserably poor, violent, and chaotic, as the White middle and working class joins what the Black and Latino classes have already embraced: single motherhood and bad-boy addiction.

Advertisements

About whiskeysplace

Conservative blogger focusing on culture, business, technology, and how they intersect.
This entry was posted in culture, hypergamy, more. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to Chicks Dig Jerks, Version 5,799

  1. Anonymous says:

    Whiskey,Here you go again with your emphasis of beta males as a good tax base, ignoring the fact that without transfer of wealth from betas to the welfare system, skanks would face real life consequences for being skanks. Stop the transfer of wealth. Not sure why you don't seem to get that.

  2. Anonymous says:

    (Cliff Arroyo)Anymore my attitude towards this kind of thing is: Screw 'em, they made their bed, let them bleed black and blue in them. Don't like getting beat up? Choose better men!One partial solution is for normal men to stop caring what happens to women who crave the bad boys.It's not just the welfare that enables this kind of pathology (though that helps) but normal men being wanting to save women from the consequences of their choices.

  3. Anonymous says:

    The one thing you're overlooking is he had two kids by an attractive white woman, in the South. If she was 27 at her death, with two kids, then she was 23 or 24 when he met her, if you account for 9 months of pregnancy for each kid. She was hotter when he met her.Women care less about the racial makeup of their kids than men do. You are attached to it, if it spends 9 months inside your body. Prove me wrong (Caylee Anthony?)!The lesson white guys can learn is direct game is the best way to go. This guy, good or bad, and I assume he is innocent until proven guilty, didn't dither around, talking about coffee shops, "a quick bite to eat", etc.He got these two girls because he has a baseball players mindset. "I might strike out 3 times, but I'm putting the other two balls into the seats".

  4. DR says:

    Again, Whiskey I've got to disagree with you about female behavior. You seem to imply that attractiveness is positively correlated with attraction to criminal and thuggish behavior.In fact attractiveness is highly correlated to socio-economic background. Women from wealthy upper class families on average are much more beautiful and attractive than women from trailer parks and the ghetto. And socio-economic background is highly correlated with women's desire for stable, non-violent, law-abiding men. Not to say that they don't desire dominant men, but the form of dominance that they desire is something like wanting a badass alpha business executive, investment banker or cardiac surgeon, rather than a badass alpha gang leader.This is clearly witnessed by the drastically lower rates of domestic violence and illegitimacy of women from upper class backgrounds. Not saying there isn't occasionally a hot girl from the trailer park (look at Brittney Spears or Lindsay Lohan), nor am I saying that sometimes an attractive girl from a wealthy family will fall in love with a criminal (Patty Hearst comes to mind).But these are the rules not the exception. The reality is the gang leaders probably do have hotter girlfriends than the other residents of the ghetto (and certainly a lot more of them). But my conjecture would be that relative attractiveness of the wives of even nerdy Harvard graduates is far higher than those of urban gang leaders.

  5. OhioStater says:

    @ DR"But my conjecture would be that relative attractiveness of the wives of even nerdy Harvard graduates is far higher than those of urban gang leaders."Absolutely not.http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/why-game-is-worth-more-than-a-billion-dollars/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/23/laura-zuniga-mexican-beau_n_153217.html

  6. Anonymous says:

    (Rolls eyes and sighs hard) This dude just won't give it up. His feelings of inadequacy and inferiority with regards to Black men is just to deep.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Just one note on betas and work. Anywhere I have found some research on truly matrilocal and matrilinear societies (no stable role of biological fathers – women fuck whoever whenever they want) there were those symptoms:- in all cases men barely work or do anything constructive- in most cases they are unable to form any organized defense forces on raiders or protect in general, but sometimes they could form into gangs- those societies are usually primitive agrarian, productive just enough to sustain such society

  8. FarmerBrown says:

    There is one point usually not discussed re the bad boy society: The alpha male,non-supportive,DGAF(Doesnt Give A F—) possibly violent guy is the black male's biological blueprint. He cant and wont be anything else.Thats the Normal.Thats his evolutionary history,200,000 years of it.(Unles you're a Creationist wacko,then its 6000 years,heh heh heh) The white guy is by nature supportive and wants to be a father.Thats HIS evolutionary history. The white child is damaged by the badboy set-up.The black child is NOT.(In fact as Oprah would agree,having a male relative around can be dangerous to your health)So if whites devolve into bad boyism,we'll be living a lifestyle that we arent cut out for. Its hard for me to believe that the white woman–brainles tho she may be–really wnats the bad boy life,the way a Mexican or Nigger does. I dont know…

  9. FarmerBrown says:

    BTW look at the Daily Mail link,the pictures are almost pornographic,theyre so ugly,of Ackerson and the other broad with their darkie babies. UGH! Sooo sickening.

  10. modernguy says:

    Chicks dig jerks when jerks are dominant. They are dominant now because good men don't have any power or authority, individually or as a group. So naturally women shun them. Life has become too safe and comfortable so masculinity has become an accessory. It isn't productively anchored. Women want the stupidest, biggest, most tattoed hulk of a man like they want the flashiest pair of shoes. Men are not needed so they've become accessories. Since there is nothing productive to do any more, men are not judged on character and productive ability but on how extreme a caricature they are of masculinity.Women are reactive and unthinking, they won't want a safe and dependable man until fear and danger are prevalent and palpable. Which is not the case in the micro-managed white nanny culture.White culture in the west is sanitized, safe and rigidly structured while you have a subset of minorities and losers who don't have to act like they give a fuck because they don't want to fit in anyway. People are stupid. When they're safe they want some danger, and when they're in danger they want safety. Women are that to the nth power.

  11. Anonymous says:

    @ modernguyYou are partially right, but also wrong. Assholes and violent men have more appeal in dangerous times. The analogy is people carry guns in rural America, since the police aren't near, whereas relying on the police works better in a big city or suburb.If there are budget cuts to the police force (which may happen), a woman living with dangerous man has protection from other dangerous men. You see this dynamic in inner city America.Where you are right is white beta males do the heavy lifting to ensure America has plenty and that no one starves.So there are alpha producers and alpha protectors. In a well ordered society this is one and the same. In our society, if production is taken for granted, then women are free to focus on other things.

  12. Stacy says:

    This is clearly witnessed by the drastically lower rates of domestic violence and illegitimacy of women from upper class backgrounds.That's rich DR. If anything the upper-middle class with it's SWPL (white liberal) elite is pretty dysfunctional due to their moral liberalism. The lower and middle classes are dysnfunctional mostly due to racial liberalism and being flooded by minorities.The only ones keeping society afloat in the West are European working and middle religious class conservatives. No I don't mean libertarians, capitalists and the GOP.And in turn this same group (the European conservative middle class) is preyed by the lower classes, the minorities present in the middle class due to the artificial creation of it (of their middle class status) and the upper-class.You're very pretentious DR. Another upper-class white liberal displaying their enlightment.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Modern guy has many good points. The average guy has lost so much power over the last 40 yrs and with not 1 shot being fired. The liberals have succeded where Nikita Kruschev "We will bury you." could not.The guy from Norway is only the first…

  14. Anonymous says:

    This black guy is not a "thug." He appears to be well off, played acoustic guitar as a performer and probably could fit in in white society.

  15. SillyRabbit says:

    To summarise the majority of modern feminist viewpoints: let us change the world so women like me(fat, ugly, whatever) have greater access to alpha males.To summarise the message of Whiskey's blog: let us change the world so that beta males like me have greater access to hot women.

  16. SillyRabbit says:

    "Anonymous said…This black guy is not a "thug." He appears to be well off, played acoustic guitar as a performer and probably could fit in in white society."I agree, in fact my first thought when I saw the mugshots was that new wife(blondie) had the psycho look about her.Possible that ex-wife went into crazy ex-wife mode and blondie wasn't playing that shit.Possible that blondie went all ghetto on ex-wife, beta who happens to be black helped her clean up the mess and implicated himself.Possible…

  17. Anonymous says:

    Wealth isn't created by "Beta Males" it's created by white people. This is racial Holocaust, not a sex problem. FUD merchant Whiskey's goal is to support the Holocaust (and all the mass-murder and rape that go with it) by sewing division among the victims with his bullshit about "It's the White Females! It's the White Females!" His secondary objective is to steer blame away from a certain group of people who claim origins in the Middle East who are at the top of this policy of genocide as its chief funders and ideologues.

  18. "Jooooooooooooooooossssss!"

  19. Zeta says:

    White women have a lot to answer for, whatever the crimes of other groups. Most white nationalist sorts, by mindlessly heaping praise on white women, are making things worse, not better. Simple as that.

  20. Anonymous says:

    Myabe all the colorful US criminals need prison Norweigan Style:good looking female guards, sun tanning facilities that appear quite private,and full guest houses to spend quality time with the inmates family. LMAO!!!

  21. Shawn says:

    I am a fair-skinned guy with blond hair and blue eyes, and, to put modesty aside, I'm fairly good-looking. One amazing thing I noticed recently is that there is a discernible difference between how women react to me, especially White women, now compared to before Anders Breivik brutally and unjustifiably killed a lot of red diaper babies. Women are much more flirty with me. It's weird. They look at me a little longer and smile. I almost get the sense that they respect me more, probably because they now view Nordic males as not being as weak, passive, and unable to dominate. They associate my features with the micro-display of violent dominance. Tangentially I think a reason why a lot of White women think Black guys are attractive is because violence and Black men has been a real reoccurring narrative. So my question is, have any other Nordic-looking guys here noticed that women respond to them differently after Breivik received all the notoriety?

  22. Anonymous says:

    "This black guy is not a "thug." He appears to be well off, played acoustic guitar as a performer and probably could fit in in white society."And yet, involved in a violent murder…..

  23. NMH says:

    Its all about the gina tingle. That black guy gave it to her, as much as a wealthy man would have—its for different reasons, but if she gets it, for whatever reason, she will mate with him and have his baby.I take BR dance lessons and there is a male teacher there who is short and skinny white guy…probably no more than a 6 in terms of looks, who lives with his mother. But he is in a constant rotation of LTR's with female 8's and 9's. One of the 8's told me because he is such a great dancer.Its all about the gina tingle for women these days.

  24. Anonymous says:

    @FarmerBrownyou wrote:"There is one point usually not discussed re the bad boy society: The alpha male,non-supportive,DGAF(Doesnt Give A F—) possibly violent guy is the black male's biological blueprint. He cant and wont be anything else.Thats the Normal.Thats his evolutionary history,200,000 years of it."—->so that would make white "badboyz" acting black then, right?"The white guy is by nature supportive and wants to be a father.Thats HIS evolutionary history."—->oh nooooo! that is "beta"!!!!!! "The white child is damaged by the badboy set-up.The black child is NOT."—->i can just feel all the "alpha" types who allegedly "don't give a fuck bro" start to cringe at the implications of that statement. am i right baaaaadboyz?"So if whites devolve into bad boyism,"—->already have"we'll be living a lifestyle that we arent cut out for"—->already are. but if you notice it then….you are "BETAAAAAAAAA"! right baaaadboyz?

  25. Anonymous says:

    So my question is, have any other Nordic-looking guys here noticed that women respond to them differently after Breivik received all the notoriety?Not me. I've always liked Nordic guys and I'm half Nordic, half-African. I want to have Nordic babies since Europe is in demographic decline and all.

  26. Anonymous says:

    I also want to add that my skin colour is like that of women like Tatyana Ali and Sanaa Lathan. Ever since I was a little girl I've always liked Nordic guys. I just don't care bad boys, assholes, thugs, losers and the stupid.

  27. Anonymous says:

    i am white but not nordic. i noticed always the nordics as being demure. they are subdued and let others speak. the are what game worshippers call beta. they support, in large measure, the society that these vermin live in who never thank them for it.

  28. Anonymous says:

    by the way, the vermin i was meaning specifically were the gamers.

  29. Anonymous says:

    White women prefer black guys. This is just another example.

  30. Anonymous says:

    and why does what women prefer even matter? worrying about what they prefer is pointless. small children prefer to eat sugary cereal and stay up all night.

  31. I love your enthuiasm and writing style.

  32. mick says:

    Life is an art. There is a very vast complex system to it but it is so large that the human brain at this time cannot comprehend it. Signs are everywhere if you look hard and feel for it. Its like a perfectly spinning ball on its axis that someone kicked and has been rolling ever since. The yen and the Yang, the black and white, the dark and light, the devil and god. Our flawed organization of society, government structure, and history is a series of cycles that seem impossible to gain insight from until we look back on the past. Societies rise and fall, there's no doubt about it and I believe we are at the beginning of a down phase. Our countryside grown too fast too quick, we've become united but still divided. I see mixed society and no understanding and no feeling of importance of the many from the ladder widening more to the bottom of the hierarchy. Evelution is real, we are physically formed for the envir we habitated from white from north hemisphere and blck from south and brown around the equator. There is global warming, we've come out of the bushes to a now industrial lazy age of soaking up the tropics, because of this there is a Browning of the U.S. that sits in the mid of the earth. We will all change according to the balance of life. Don't feel remorseful, embrace, embrace the in-controllable or nah keep trying to control it, its human nature.

Comments are closed.