This is Not 1979

Obama’s weak, Carter-like response to the entirely predictable, AQ-led ransacking of our Cairo Embassy, and the murders by an AQ-led Libyan mob in Benghazi of our Ambassador to that nation, the US Chief Information Officer, and two Marines would lead observers to suspect this is 1979 all over again. But it is not. The nation has changed. And not for the better. Most Americans don’t care, would like to surrender as quickly as possible to Islam, and agree with Obama that groveling and apologizing (as he has) to the Muslim mobs is the best solution possible. This is why the Press, which has a herd mentality, is attacking Romney over his condemnation of Obama’s groveling and apologies for the Cairo invasion of our Embassy and murder of four Diplomatic personnel in Libya (an act of War against us). Most Americans agree with Obama. It is time to surrender.

But surrender has costs too. While the murder of the four men in Libya, and the burning of our Consulate, and take-over of the Embassy in Cairo, on 9/11’s eleventh anniversary, is more likely than not to re-elect Obama (confirming the wisdom seemingly of groveling), that policy has costs that mount up quickly. Like balloon payment mortgages after the teaser rates expire. The cost is nothing less than Sharia in the US, with all the brutality that implies. Which is sure to touch off a civil War (a hot one) in the US. One that will make the Shays Rebellion (from whence I take my nom-de-blog) look like a picnic.

Just as I wrote in Nike vs. the Urban League, for normal, middle class White Americans, the price for Black dysfunction is a steady and constant erosion of liberty and freedom in every day life, the cost of not standing up to Muslims at home and abroad is Sharia in the US. That is a recipe for a hot Civil War.

If some Americans just a few years after the end of the Revolutionary War and much death and destruction, were willing to go to war with George Washington over distilling Whiskey and not paying taxes, and they were, what do you think outlawing beer, all other booze, dogs, naked women, bacon, all pork products, music, and anything else Muslims don’t like (basically, anything fun that makes life worth living) will do to Generation X-box? Porn, Beer, and Fast Food is their only way of coping now. Tell Joe Slacker he has to live like a Muslim fanatic and he’ll actively fight you. And you’d be surprised how good he would get too.

Muslims take offense at anything and everything. The center of attack was an obscure film by an even more obscure person who may be an Egyptian Copt or Egyptian Jew, that has not been released, but excerpts have been on Youtube. The whole thing was staged across Libya and Egypt by the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda (the two are basically the same) and quite likely with the connivance of Huma Abedin, who has extensive ties to AQ/Muslim Brotherhood fanatics through her late Father, her Mother, and her Brother. All of whom are Muslim Brotherhood/AQ fanatics (but I repeat myself).

Nothing of this movie showed up in the media. Not on USA Today, not in the WSJ, not in the New York Times, not on CBS, ABC, or NBC. No one had even heard of it. It was reputedly shot on video, partially, and is not even finished, in Southern California. Matt Damon did not star in it. Disney did not spend $400 million promoting it. Joss Whedon did not write it. It had a bunch of amateurs who quit halfway through, afraid of Muslim violence, and has not even been finished much less released to a single theater.

Yet Muslims, ordinary Muslims, murdered four Americans serving their country over this film, and trashed the US Embassy in Cairo, tearing down the US Flag and hoisting that of AQ.

Muslims will kill Americans over any and every slight there is. Even those that exist only in their minds. The only solution is deterrence through FEAR.

America, if it is not to live under total Sharia law, must make Muslims afraid. By killing a whole lot of them, repeatedly, when provoked, and being seen to do that again and again. But the fear must be “rational” as Machiavelli advises. The punishments and killings must be predictable, and calibrated. Muslims can gripe and scream and shout, and the US will simply pull aid and let them starve. Muslims create acts of War, and they get their cities ruined, their dams burst, their places flooded, their ports wrecked, and starve in the ruins even more.

Fear, and fear alone, works with Muslims. No President has apologized more for America, than Obama. Indeed he started off by doing so in Cairo. No President has groveled as much. No President has backed AQ and the Muslim Brotherhood as much. And this is the reaction.

The country has changed since 1979. You cannot expect Mexicans, even those born in this country, to care about dead Marines and White guys. They don’t. Even those born here consider themselves Mexicans, and if anything have a great deal of sympathy for the Muslim murderers of our Embassy people. After 9/11, most Mexicans attitudes was that the US got what was coming to them, and a certain quiet or not so quiet celebration. Black people don’t feel much different, Richard Williams, father to Serena and Venus, said he hates White men and does not consider himself American. No Black public figure rebuked him, because from Chris Rock (“4th of July is for White people”) to Barack Obama, the same attitude applies. Asians don’t feel patriotic. Chinese remain Chinese, simply being born in the US or living here does not fill them with pain and anger over seeing White American men dragged around like garbage. They don’t care, or agree with it. The same is true for nearly all immigrants. If anything, they’re cheering the murders.

The change is among Whites too. Certainly among women, the instinct is just to surrender. Women don’t do well in fighting, and can always be the new mistresses or washerwomen to the new conquerors. Indeed, Muslims are “untouchable” because they act like Chris Brown on steroids. Women don’t hate Chris Brown, on the contrary.

Women DO hate beta males. They HATE HATE HATE them. Far too considerate, “nice,” cloying in their egalitarian ways, the equalism. Women crave dominance, and the more society is equal between the sexes, the more women crave “Fifty Shades of Grey” BDSM style dominance, or Chris Brown. Or Muslim dominance, for that matter. If Caesar divided Gaul into three, so do women. Alpha, Beta, and Gay.

Gay men are the ideal for non-Alphas. They are fabulous and uninterested in women sexually, and offer titillation. The more female dominated a section of society is, the more gay it becomes. This is inevitable as a fabulous gay fashion designer throwing a hissy fit over the wrong shade of mauve in the dressing room. Alpha men are excused anything and everything. All that matters is dominance, nothing else. Give women that dominance and anything, I mean anything, is excused.

Beta males, well they are barely tolerated. No one does equalist, “nice” guys like White guys, so that is the principal reason White male is considered an insult. Its just another way of saying “sexless eunuch.” After all, no one insults White women that way. “White woman” is not an insult implying sexless identity and original sin of being a neuter.

And no one cares about sexless eunuchs. Certainly not women.

This is why it is NOT 1979. The country is not outraged. Just four White men dragged around as corpses on TV by Alpha males who are Muslim and Brown from another country. Would women be upset by THAT?. Beta, please. Certainly you don’t see National Council of La Raza, the Urban League, or CAIR demanding justice for the dead and punishment of the Muslim mob. No one but their families, friends, and a few people living in the last century, when America meant something and “White guy ” was not an insult denoting masculine worthlessness, cares. Only those few get angry and enraged. The rest shrug, or pretend to shrug, to get into a chick’s pants. [The surest way to celibacy is to challenge the Alpha-male led worldview of women age 18-55.] Or express their racial and ethnic identity, which is always anti-White male. Which always has been and will be, and as a result has no anger and outrage over a bunch of dead White guys. Chris Rock doesn’t care. Neither does Morgan Freeman. Or George Lopez. Certainly Oprah doesn’t — the victims were not gay. Compare/contrast the treatment of Matthew Shephard vs. Reginald Denny.

What matters is Alpha. Daytime talk is a good window on the female worldview:

America is shaped, and run, essentially, by over fifty years of TV advertising and media aimed nearly exclusively at women. Women account for over 85% of all consumer purchases and frankly, they don’t give a damn about anyone other than Alpha males.

A White, fifty something Ambassador, a similar Chief Information Officer, and two young Marines, dragged like trash around Libyan streets by a Muslim mob just does not get most women angry or upset. Guess what, they side with the Alphas! Who are not a bunch of White guys. You didn’t see the audience at the VMAs cheer for Rihanna kissing say, Weird Al now did you? As young (mostly White) teen girls wrote on Twitter: I’d let Chris Brown beat me anytime. Only Alpha matters for men. Nothing else.

So, Obama doing nothing but apologizing is likely to be popular with women. The men killed were not worth getting upset about, for most Women. Certainly most of the hot ones (who dominate the sex market, this just in, not many men desire Roseanne Barr). Which in turn shapes male attitudes among those not courting celibacy.

But the apologizing is only going to create more and more demands. Which in turn will require hard enforcement of Sharia in the US. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs has called for withdrawing the film which is difficult because it has not even be finished or released. Now Egypt is bringing criminal actions and demanding extradition to Egypt against the US film-maker. Predictably. MSNBC host Mike Barnicle (and Johnny Deutsch) want to try the film-maker and Pastor Terry Jones for both Blasphemy against Islam and murder. [Terry Jones apparently has nothing to do with the film and had not heard of it until the murders.]

In order to keep AQ and the Muslim Brotherhood and Muslims happy, we will have to turn America into Saudi Arabia, or start killing lots and lots and lots of Muslims. On a regular basis. There is no way around that, any more than Black dysfunction when tolerated means Nike cannot make expensive athletic shoes because young Black men kill over the shoes. And personal freedom gets eroded bit by bit by bit.

Which for most women, is fine. As long as sexual freedom to hook up with Alphas (no one wants Betas) is sacrosanct. Of course, the slut-walks and the like will have to end just as much as the movies about Mohammed or what have you. Just as owning dogs, drinking beer, or seeing a woman not in a black moving bag will have to go. So eventually there will be a fight. What, White beta males will tolerate living in the Muslim version of “Kelly and Michael?”

For now, America will appease and crawl and beg, because it suits most women (and liberal politics, but I repeat myself like Sandra Fluke demanding more taxpayer money for her sex life). Obama if anything gets a boost, because ignoring the plight of White beta males suits the politics of his coalition (White women, non-Whites, rich coastal elites) more than any other response. Romney will be hurt by it, as most will take their cue from younger, attractive women who don’t care at all about any non-Alpha. It is not 1979. But eventually it will become 1789.

A fight is coming. Sooner or later. Guaranteed.

Advertisements

About whiskeysplace

Conservative blogger focusing on culture, business, technology, and how they intersect.
This entry was posted in appeasement, demographics, islam, jihad. Bookmark the permalink.

100 Responses to This is Not 1979

  1. Anonymous says:

    “America” is dead, Americans just haven’t realized it yet. I don’t care about “our” flag getting pulled down or some shitbag career lefty “ambassador” being murdered. The new motto of america is “die cis scum”. That’s what he was the ambassador of, and that’s why he got killed. Does suck for the Marines but then again they signed up for this.

  2. sestamibi says:

    Magnificent post as usual, whiskey. We need your thoughts more often.

    I bought a shotgun the weekend after Obama was elected. Looks like I better start learning how to use it.

  3. sestamibi says:

    PS. By the way, whiskey, did you see this when it came out?

    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/05/total-war-islam/

  4. dana says:

    its like a holiday when i find a new post from you in my google reader–please whiskey, write more often,

  5. chucho says:

    The more Islamic terror, intolerance and sheer idiocy dominate the news, the worse things are for the Left. Islam is *the* wedge issue to wake up the slumbering masses of white guys who watch the Daily Show and think Obama is “cool”. The Left’s tolerance and even coddling of Islam is their weakest link by far–it reveals the naked truth that they are nothing short of nihilists. As Moldbug said, once you start doubting Leftism a little, there’s no reason you shouldn’t start doubting it a lot. The more Islam rages, the more people will wake up.

  6. Brandon says:

    Hey, Whiskey, good post. I do question your lumping of ALL white guys into the castrated eunuch category. I also question your assertion that all white females loathe white males. Perhaps you write in general rules, and what you describe appears to be an urban/suburban phenomenon. Us rural white boys of the cowboy/redneck variety tend to be very well loved by the white women we know. However, due to the unabashed masculinity of many of us, we probably terrify urban liberal white women as the “evil redneck racist uneducated white brute” that they’ve be taught to see as the devil incarnate. Yet, they tend to oftentimes make us the object of their romance fantasy books.

    And another thing, your talk of Sharia Law in the US and whatnot seems a bit over the top. Surely there isnt that many muslims in the US? Either way, my state (Oklahoma) outlawed it with 70% of the vote in 2010.

    Overall, you write the truth and I am look forward to your new posts.

    • Oh, I would never call White guys “emasculated.” Just that as women become equal to them, they demand ever and greater and ickier amounts of domination. Women in say, 1952 would have been disgusted by “Fifty Shades of Grey” which is now sold openly in Supermarkets. And is nothing but bondage porn, and extreme at that.

      As for Sharia, the point is that it has to be enforced if the society is not willing to fight. Muslims here and there are willing to fight. So unless we are willing to deter them by fighting harder, better, and creating FEAR, we will have to submit. Already academics, MSNBC, and others are calling for Blasphemy laws against Islam. In the UK, they effectively already exist.

      • Matt Strictland says:

        That certain subset of women who fantasize (or seek out) hard core S&M domination is nothing new.

        After all the Story of O was published in 1954 and its been in print pretty much constantly. Its also been made into a movie several times. None of them good alas.

        No doubt that the “victims” in many Victorian Penny Dreadfuls also got womens juices running.

  7. Don't Tread On Me says:

    Regarding the prospect of a second American Civil War…I say bring it on, the sooner the better.

  8. Jax says:

    Bit of a non sequitor here, Obama capitulates and looks weak (beta), and Romney talks tough (like and alpha) and this is a win for Obama? How is that? Is the argument that White guys can never be alpha? I don’t think so. Regardless of Romney actually being alpha or not at least he is making the stand. Don’t you think that all those White women, the ‘mothers’ of those White Marines killed in this attack don’t perk up when Romney cries for blood revenge? Is the argument that mothers want their boys killed and prefer surrender from a mulatto instead of tough talk from the honorary “Dad” (Romney).

    How is it that Chris Brown can get the ‘gina tingles from slapping around his bitch, but Papa Romney gets no love for threatening death and destruction upon the killers of “our boys”. It’s a strange world you postulate when every women is driven only by her sexual instinct, which by all measures is a fraction of the male instinct, and none by the maternal instinct. I think you spend too much time in singles bars in big cities!

    • I would not say every White woman, but most single women under say, 45, share those general sentiments in the urban and suburban areas. Alpha is whoever women say the are, its an admitedly circular definition but one that encapsulates reality.

      If say the Libyans had dragged a gay Black man around, well that would be one thing. White women would be outraged. But an ordinary set of White guys? Would women really care? It would be a first. No one cared about Reginald Denny. Or the Contractors hung from a bridge in Iraq. Or the White guys killed in 9/11.

      • Robert in Arabia says:

        Please explain to me why I should care when a diplomat who conspired to overthrow Qaddafi and bring Islamists to power is allegedly killed by the Islamists he worked to empower. Bad karma.

  9. fakeemail says:

    Powerfully stated in regards to how mexicans, blacks, and the sundry brown American “citizens” do not consider themselves American. And how could they? They are not white. Period. Blood is thicker than water and a “proposition nation” is no nation at all. A good economy cannot tie different people’s together as the libertardians would have us believe.

    Not only that, but they are hostile against America as you stated. They all figure the white western world has screwed them out of their glorious destinies (ha!) and it’s payback time. 911 was the ultimate and inevitable act of MULTICULTURALISM. The beginning of the end of American/white empire, hegemony, and demographics.

    You are of course correct about the women-folk. They have little to no respect for the “white guys” any more.. The fact is this: nations are created by homogenous groups of men in order for those men to have privileged status in that land; just as one should have privileged status in one’s own house. These privileges includes the culture of your ancestors and dibs on jobs and women. A nation is a place for a group of men to delineate their breeding grounds with their women.

    But the white race has given up this “white privilege” because it has been told to us that it is the gravest injustice of all time; even though every other race maintains this privilege in their own nations. As such, white women further disdain white men and are always ready to jump ship to be with the victor. Women, like merchants, really don’t have any loyalty in and of itself. They are creatures purely driven by the tide and have no concept of objectivity or eternal truths.

    I hope Romney wins, but it doesn’t really matter unless he closes the border, ends welfare, and deports millions. It’s the demographics, stupid.

    • Jesus Christ Supercop says:

      “These privileges includes the culture of your ancestors and dibs on jobs and women. A nation is a place for a group of men to delineate their breeding grounds with their women.”

      Sounds like you’ll fit in well with Muslims.

      • Pete says:

        No because the conquerors always take the women, dummy. As blacks and mexicans are taking white women away from white men today, if muslims conquer in a second wave, white women will submit to them in turn.

  10. This episode is dumping a big pile of nihilist seaweed on our collective shores, the sick ooze swelling beneath the supposedly peaceful surface of the American psyche. An actual Ambassador, to a country we (for better or for worse) recently helped “liberate”, is Cannibal Holocaust-ed by a terrorist mob, and to the President, the State Department, and the MSM, this is all collateral damage, a moral write-off, and the only thing worth a debate is the supposed impropriety of some remarks by the candidate for President, who, some hysterical figures even among the paleocon right are alleging, has doomed his chances for election, by doing– what? Hinting at outrage for the murder of our Ambassador? Suggesting Obama’s foreign policy is weak?

    –Oh, and of course how we need to curtail our retrograde and vile fundamentalism about some medieval “freedom of speech” which only hurts and exploits nobler, more sensitive peoples in morally superior lands, some of whom are gracious enough to live here and collect our stingy welfare!

    The coddling of Islam by supposedly Freethinking, Atheist/Skeptic left-wingers is just breathtaking. In 300 years time, God willing, reasonable historians of some surviving West can write detailed monograms on this While The West Slept idiocy. I see young feminists on purported punk-ass venues like “Bust” magazine doing glowing tributes to young Muslim fashionistas (!?) who design modest Muslim wear for Muslim women. These are nose-ringed, SlutWalker, c**t this, c**t that “feminists” who would foam, rage, and spit upon any Christian female suggesting “modesty” as a virtue– and yet, just watch them roll like fat tabbies for MultiCult. Truly, mental masochism is mass hysteria in the West today, and these people’s truest, darkest fantasy is to expiate their imagined sins by total thrall (political, cultural, and– very much so– sexual) to the darker Other.

  11. Jesus Christ Supercop says:

    One thing that’s really going to delay a conflict against Muslims in the US is the enormous size and decentralized nature of the country.

  12. Anonymous says:

    Shays rebellion was in 1786 before the adoption of the Constitution. The Whiskey Rebellion came later in Washington’s 2nd term. Both were put down rather easily. Don’t get excited, after all, the commenters here don’t seem to care about U.S. embassies being attacked either.

  13. Jim says:

    Problem with minorities and women is they falsely assume the system will continue as is and the subsidies will still be there. Not happening. Once the economic mountain collapses, the so called demographic change in 2041 is off the shelf. Whites will push back eventually as they tire of the mass hate poured onto them time and time again. Watch and see.

    The only glue holding the country together is the government. Whites will soon realize that it’s the cause of it all especially as their voices become muffled yet the expectations they pay into it are shouted aloud. Going Galt by them will be why the left never realizes it’s Eutopia.

  14. sydney carton says:

    There’ll be no resistance. The Whiskey rebellion was put down in no time, with todays police state, good grief, SWAT will be kicking in the door before you’ve given it a second thought. I don’t fancy being on the recieving end in one of those AH 64 youtube videos.

    Besides, a people that accepts the TSA is already dead and not fit for freedom.

  15. RADIO/TELEVISION TRANSMISSION
    13 SEPT 2012 0900 [1600Z]

    TRANSCRIPT BEGINS

    Attention, people of Libya. Attention people of Libya.

    In response to the attack on our embassy in Benghazi and the murder of its personnel by citizens of your country on 11 September, the military forces of the United States of Americs will destroy that city. We repeat: the city of Benghazi will be destroyed. In our mercy, we give the people of the city 72 hours in which to evacuate and escape certain death. The destruction of Benghazi
    will take place 72 hours from now, at 0900 Benghazi time, on 17 September 2012. Anyone in on near the city of Benghazi at that time will die. This will be your only warning. This announcement will be repeated in one hour, and every hour thereafter until the city is destroyed.

    We repeat: In response to the attack on our embassy in Benghazi and the murder of its personnel by citizens of your country on 11 September, the military forces of the United States of America will destroy that city. The city of Benghazi will be destroyed. In our mercy, we give the people of the city 72 hours in which to evacuate and escape certain death. The destruction of Benghazi will take place 72 hours from now, at 0900 Benghazi time, on 17 September 2012. Anyone in on near the city of Benghazi at that time will die. This will be your only warning. This announcement will be repeated in one hour, and every hour thereafter until the city is destroyed.

    The destruction of Benghazi is both a punishment and a warning. All those hearing this message should consider well the consequences of any attack upon the citizens, nationals, property, facilities, or forces of the United States of America.

    This message is concluded.

    TRANSCRIPT ENDS

    • Robert in Arabia says:

      Nato bombed Chinese deliberately | World news | The Observer

      http://www.guardian.co.uk › News › World news – Cached

      17 Oct 1999 – Nato deliberately bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during the war in … a view to developing effective counter-measures against US missiles. … On this ‘don’t hit’ map, the Chinese embassy was correctly located at its …

  16. Jim says:

    Armed resistance? No, not yet anyway. But going underground and paying as little into the system is the beginning.

    A few years ago there was a group of people who bought a full page in the USA Today that warned the nation they would go Galt. These people aren’t the middle class. I doubt they’ve seen anything to change their minds.

  17. whorefinder says:

    The cover-up by the press of this—and the attacks on Romney for daring to question the Nigger-in-Chief’s non-response—say all you need to know about how far we’ve fallen.

  18. Tripemaster says:

    Hello Whiskey,

    I’ve been reading your blog for a while now. Sometimes I think your analysis of today’s culture is very good (for example when you wrote a post about how rock music is “dead”), but sometimes as

    Brandon points out, the views you put forward are more questionable.

    I live in Scotland and since you are American, it is hard to say whether what applies in America applies to where I live. Certainly where I live (Aberdeen) there are not insignificant cultural

    differences from other parts of the UK as well, especially the large English urban centres.

    You say that white males are “beta males” and “eunuchs” who are hated by white females. Now I really don’t know how true this is. The idea that women are attracted to men who display the greatest

    degree of social dominance would seem to make sense, but it’s really difficult to say how this ties in with race if it does at all. You are just one blogger, Whiskey, and you do not have a monopoly

    on truth – nobody does; every blogger and writer is just expressing different opinions.

    What I will say is that when I do see black/white mixed-race relationships, 90% + of the time, it is a black man with a white woman. Which is actually kind of a similar ratio to what it is in porn.

    I would describe my own political views as right-wing. From Wikipedia:

    “Inequality is viewed by the Right as either inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, whether it arises through traditional social differences or from competition in market economies.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics

    I personally just view inequality as inevitable, rather than actually desirable. We are biological organisms, as Darwin pointed out, and there is no God. As such, life will always contain its

    winners and losers. This applies just as much to the sexual sphere as it does to any other aspect of life. Attempts to suppress competition, by trying to enforce equality, will only create new

    manifestations of inequality.

    But how much are white males really hated? I don’t know about America, but here in Scotland white males don’t seem to be hated all that much. Despite a strongly leftist political structure, this

    does not yet really seem to have affected ordinary people’s worldview a great deal, which is still to some extent rooted in socially conservative values, even if people don’t consciously realise

    it.

    Which brings me onto another point. The Scottish comedian Frankie Boyle (who you may not have heard of) describes himself as very left-wing politically. Yet, his jokes can often be extremely

    politically incorrect, with subject matter including Katie Price’s disabled, mixed-race child, Harvey, raping his mother. That’s about as un-PC as you can get, yet he gets away with it. A similar

    effect can also be seen with Jeremy Clarkson and the comments he makes that are picked up on in the media. Perhaps such figures are allowed to exist as token “heretics” against political

    correctness, to create something for people to laugh at whilst they ignore the massive changes that are taking place in society. I’d like to add Richard Littlejohn to this list (not that he’s much

    like Frankie Boyle, mind) who is almost something of a British version of Fred Phelps, having an obsessive dislike of homosexuals.

    Can you please respond and reply Whiskey? Thanks.

    • Here in the US “White guy” is used routinely as an insult. By comedians, of the left. Bill Maher, Jay Leno, Conan O’Brien, David Letterman, all use it. On TV extensively. White guys are not eunuchs, just regarded as such by the elites and women, for the most part. You can see this in any commercial. The White woman and Black guy always patronize the “idiot eunuch White guy” repeated ad nasueum.

      • Tripemaster says:

        That’s interesting.

        Here in Scotland we would not really even use the word “white” to describe ourselves. We would certainly not hesitate to describe a black person as “black”, and although I think we understand what “white” means, it is probably seen largely as an Americanism and so is rarely used. Anders Behring Breivik said a similar thing in his manifesto; he said that “in Europe there is no ‘white’, they regard themselves as European”.

        You say that most American women regard white males as “eunuchs”? Isn’t that a little bit too extreme? Or maybe not? I don’t know…

        And if most American women think that white males are “eunuchs” now, then most British and European women will probably think that white males in their own countries are “eunuchs” in 20 or 30 years… it’s hard to predict, really hard to say, but things do seem to be heading in that direction as a result of the white racial demographic collapse throughout the West.

        All I can say is, I really hate being a white heterosexual male.

  19. Tripemaster says:

    Easier to read version (I typed it out in Notepad and was using Word Wrap)…

    Hello Whiskey,

    I’ve been reading your blog for a while now. Sometimes I think your analysis of today’s culture is very good (for example when you wrote a post about how rock music is “dead”), but sometimes as Brandon points out, the views you put forward are more questionable.

    I live in Scotland and since you are American, it is hard to say whether what applies in America applies to where I live. Certainly where I live (Aberdeen) there are not insignificant cultural differences from other parts of the UK as well, especially the large English urban centres.

    You say that white males are “beta males” and “eunuchs” who are hated by white females. Now I really don’t know how true this is. The idea that women are attracted to men who display the greatest degree of social dominance would seem to make sense, but it’s really difficult to say how this ties in with race if it does at all. You are just one blogger, Whiskey, and you do not have a monopoly on truth – nobody does; every blogger and writer is just expressing different opinions.

    What I will say is that when I do see black/white mixed-race relationships, 90% + of the time, it is a black man with a white woman. Which is actually kind of a similar ratio to what it is in porn.

    I would describe my own political views as right-wing. From Wikipedia:

    “Inequality is viewed by the Right as either inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, whether it arises through traditional social differences or from competition in market economies.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics

    I personally just view inequality as inevitable, rather than actually desirable. We are biological organisms, as Darwin pointed out, and there is no God. As such, life will always contain its winners and losers. This applies just as much to the sexual sphere as it does to any other aspect of life. Attempts to suppress competition, by trying to enforce equality, will only create new manifestations of inequality.

    But how much are white males really hated? I don’t know about America, but here in Scotland white males don’t seem to be hated all that much. Despite a strongly leftist political structure, this does not yet really seem to have affected ordinary people’s worldview a great deal, which is still to some extent rooted in socially conservative values, even if people don’t consciously realise it.

    Which brings me onto another point. The Scottish comedian Frankie Boyle (who you may not have heard of) describes himself as very left-wing politically. Yet, his jokes can often be extremely politically incorrect, with subject matter including Katie Price’s disabled, mixed-race child, Harvey, raping his mother. That’s about as un-PC as you can get, yet he gets away with it. A similar effect can also be seen with Jeremy Clarkson and the comments he makes that are picked up on in the media. Perhaps such figures are allowed to exist as token “heretics” against political correctness, to create something for people to laugh at whilst they ignore the massive changes that are taking place in society. I’d like to add Richard Littlejohn to this list (not that he’s much like Frankie Boyle, mind) who is almost something of a British version of Fred Phelps, having an obsessive dislike of homosexuals.

    Can you please respond and reply Whiskey? Thanks.

  20. Heil Hizzle says:

    Whiskey, I enjoy reading your blog, but there is some gray, some ambiguity between alpha and beta. Most women do not like men who exude pure masculinity, i.e. a boxer or a gangster, but they seem to prefer men who have some sort of maybe androgynous, masculine\feminine balance to them. I imagine if you poll most women in America, they will prefer Johnny Depp over Chris Brown any day of the week.

    Also, there are a lot of guys who waste their time playing video games, and they have spouses and girlfriends who either a) join in with them, or b) bitterly complain but accept their husband\boyfriend’s hobbies, the same way they might put up with a guy who likes to tinker with hot rods in the garage.

    You said in a previous post that (paraphrase) “Women unrestrained by morality will prefer sadism in their men,” but most women have a threshold beyond which they will tolerate no more. Exogamy in marriage is still fairly rare for white women, and those who are prey to popular culture, rap music, and the indoctrination that comes with the American sports complex are honestly the weak minded ones who are being weeded out. Exogamy among women who have babies outside of marriage might be high in the instance of black men and white women, but these are just genetic and dysfunctional relationships, usually between overweight white women and black men.

    Put simply, most girls who are going to receive a college education and put effort into the rearing of their children would would would still rather fuck Edward Cullen than Chris Brown.

    The first thing I thought when I saw that this American Ambassador had been murdered was that, This sort of reminds me of when Archbishop France Ferdinand was murdered in Sarajevo.

  21. agimarc says:

    One of these days someone is going to do to the Muzzies what Mel Brooks did to the Nazis with Springtime for Hitler from The Producers and their collective heads will explode. And it couldn’t happen to a nicer group of folks. Bring popcorn. South Park did it a time or two and those shows were buried by PC aficionados the Comedy network. Time to quit worrying about the tender psyches of the Muslims. Time for them to start worrying about us. Cheers –

  22. Toddy cat says:

    Time for secession. Amputate the rotten coasts, and let the healthy cebter of the country recover. It’s got a better chance of working than anything else.

  23. Matt Strictland says:

    As for the event at hand, I find it hard to be outraged. We in the West bring this on ourselves by dealing with these people and their societies, which in their own ways are sicker than ours. Buy the oil, get out and keep them out. No heck, better use no more than we can produce and don’t build an economy on cheap energy and cheaper labor.

    Note too that no one is respecting embassies these days. Britain threatened to invade Ecuador’s embassy over Julian Assange and given that violence can and will be used it isn’t measurably different.

    The entire Treaty of Westphalia/ Post Napoleonic system is frayed at the edges which bodes poorly for stability .

  24. ikko says:

    What happened to Chris Stevens in Benghazi was poetic justice. Watch that evil witch Hillary Clinton gloat about killing Gadafi, “we can we saw he died.” Gadafi, who had normalized relations with the US, and who was helping the US fight Al Qaeda. Condi Rice and McCain met him recently and shook his hand, then cheered on his murder at the hands of a crazed Islamic mob, along with Hillary Clinton and the women around Obama who ran the Lybia war. The US stabbed an ally in the back and helped install its enemies. Chris Stevens, the ambassador, was part of that. Now he gets exactly the same treatment from the people he stupidly sought to “bring democracy” to. It is karma and poetic justice, and the Russians are seeing it that way too by the way.

    How about this for a third option. Leave Muslim countries alone, or at least stop deposing friendly dictators like Gadafi, or Mubarak, and expecting anything other than Islamic tyranny to come about. Now the US is doing the same thing in Syria, deposing Assad, and what will follow him will surely be an Islamic Sunni state. And these same people will be around pretending that they didn’t know this kind of thing would happen, when this is entirely predictable.

    Let the Muslims stew in their own juices. Let them fight Israel and India, it’s not the US’ fight. The alternatives you give are false. The US doesn’t need to change its laws and it doesn’t need to kill Muslims. It killed Muslims recently in Lybia and bombed it, which is why this happened in Lybia in the first place; it wouldn’t have happened under Gadafi. How about just keeping our own laws and letting them keep theirs. Who cares if they kill each other? As for killing Americans in the US, that’s an immigration control problem; you don’t need to kill people for that.

    The rest of what you say about white men is your usual cuckold bullshit, not worth addressing.

  25. ikko says:

    Just read through these posts.
    Amazing, not a single commenter realizes that this has to do with the war that happened LAST YEAR, when the US deposed Gadafi in an act of extreme treachery. When you kill your friends and help your enemies, what do you think happens? The US ambassador, who was probably behind the mob that killed Gadafi, or at least who rejoiced at that vile murder together with Hillary Clinton, just got exactly the same treatment.

    And nobody gave a shit about killing the brown Gadafi, Whiskey. Women like Clinton cheered it on. Stop trying to turn this into the 24/7 Whiskey cuckold show.

    • Because it happened last year. And it was done by ostensible “Allies” who Obama cozened — the Muslim Brotherhood. This kiling was NOT done by Khadaffi. It was done by the Brothers. And done for the sake of getting the Blind Sheikh, serving a lifetime prison sentence, out.

      There is no place to withdraw from. You’re living in a fantasy world, where if we just “behave nicely” Muslims will refrain from killing us. Yeah how’d that work out on 9/11? Or again on 9/11. In order to stop the killing, abroad and at home, of ordinary American by Muslims, we either:

      Submit to Sharia. Which will cause civil war. Which is likely to get both of us killed, quick.

      Or we use force to intimidate and kill Muslims. You know force works. You are not able to say what you think and feel in public. Because you know the consequence. This is true. You know it in your own life. Yet you deny it in public life.

      As far as White women go, why else would ads aimed at them portray White guys as useless wimps? They might want Edward Cullen over Chris Rock, but they’d rather a Black President than a White one. White women are uber-liberal, favor Obama by a current 14 points in the latest Rasmussen poll, and don’t care ever about White guys getting killed. They just don’t. They do about gays and non-White men. But never ordinary White guys. I have never ever seen it.

      • ikko2 says:

        Yes that was my point, he was killed by the Muslim Brotherhood, which HE HELPED INSTALL. Do you understand that? This man, Chris Stevens was a treacherous bastard who stabbed our ally Gadafi in the back, and either was the one who actually helped that mob kill Gadafi or cheered it on the same way his boss Hillary Clintong did.

        Now the same mob that he helped kill Gadafi killed and raped him, in the same way. If that’s not poetic justice, what is?

        The Russians are having a good time watching American stupidity in action.

        And stop it with the clichees about surrender. If the US had let Gadafi stay in power, this wouldn’t have happened. It’s the US going around the world abetting the MB and installing Sunni Islamic regimes everywhere. Now they’re trying to do the same thing in Syria.

        9/11 could have been avoided with profiling at airports and with immigration restriction; no need to have American guys die in Yemeni hills trying to “bring democracy” to those bastards. Let Muslims kill each other, the US has NO INTERESTS in that part of the world.

  26. Eddie Munster. says:

    “Stop trying to turn this into the 24/7 Whiskey cuckold show”
    I thought I was the only one. Every post, no matter how intelligent or ostensibly what the subject matter may be, eventually dovetails into this rage over the indignities suffered by Betas. Whiskey contradicts himself, however, because many times, as he even pointed out in his post on Breivik, the Betas are more sadistic than the alphas. Some men are strong and decent. Some men are weak and cruel. His analysis ignores this kind of nuance.
    He is also a little too keen on absolutes, which will look stupid in hindsight, i.e. Obama ruling by martial law fiat, or Shia rule coming soon to a neighborhood near you. Yeah, the parking lot at Home Depot is filled to the brim with Muslims jockeying for a crack at day labor.

  27. ikko says:

    Some men are strong and cruel…
    Whiskey is also wrong about his general view of civilization. Real culture and civilization is not created by “betas.” Modern degenerate civilization is created by “betas”; Nietzsche called it the Last Man, not beta. It’s a cockroach and deserves to be exterminated.

    • Heil Hizzle says:

      Again, dealing in absolutes, when the truth would serve you better. A society is not composed entirely of betas or alphas, or all intelligent people, or all stupid people. A society is a hearty cross-section of skills. You could argue that it is uniform in terms of racial stock, or religion. But to think that you could have a society of nothing but warriors is foolish and stupid.

      This “kill the cockroach” mentality is also foolish. Because once you kill the cockroach, the bloodlust of the masses is still not sated, and new cockroaches need to be found. And they may decide that you are now the new cockroach.

      This happened repeatedly in Communists show trials where one round of accusations would cause hysteria. Certain people would be removed from the shoe production quota institutes or the agrarian collective, and then many times the previous accuser would find himself on the receiving end. And then he would receive his “justice”

      • ikko says:

        We’re not even talking about the same thing. I have no idea what you’re talking about.

        Whiskey is wrong. Civilization and culture are not created by “betas.”

    • Beta males do create civilization. How do you think all those steam engines were built? By uber-sexy Don Juans prancing around? Then how were all those power plants, and sewage treatment plants, and sewer lines built? Again by prancing Alphas? A society functions better or worse depending on how much male cooperation, technology, and science it creates. Ghana with Witchcraft detention centers and Uganda with child sacrirfice for voodoo are nasty places to live, Finland with nerdy White guys is a nice place to live.

      Yes Beta males are capable of great cruelty and violence, but it is not the kind of Alpha aholeness that turns women on. It is organized, it is cooperative, it massive and technology oriented. Think Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Coventry, Rotterdam, Hamburg, or Dresden. It also wins, completely. After a dose of good and hard beta male violence, neither Germany nor Japan are eager for another.

      But that is the tragedy of the West. Science and prosperity and power rest on beta males, which repulse women. Sexy men create a weak and easily dominated society.

      • fakeemail says:

        Harry Truman was a a total beta male president. The guy was a haberdasher, for pete’s sake who was thrust into power. He was the kind of man who lived in a time where it was okay for him to put the lives of thousands of beta male American troops ahead of the lives of Japanese civilians. And America loved him for it. (Not today, however. . .)

        An alpha president today in a similar situation would show his alpha-ness by sacrificing the beta troops in the interest of the enemy combatants and civilians. Heck, that idea is codified by the military in “just war theory”.

      • ikko2 says:

        The men who built sewers and those other things are not the men who “built civilization,” any more than construction workers are the ones who “built the Parthenon.” They’re tools, and they’ve never, ever been liked by women, even in premodern times, and for good reason. They’re entirely dependent tools.

        I don’t know I study history and I don’t see ancient Roman, Greek or medieval European civilization being created by betas. Maybe you read another kind of history where prudent shopkeepers and engineers built these places. I guess if you literally mean who “built” the sewage systems, yeah I guess. I’m not surprised women don’t get wet over that. Those kinds of men were never considered honorable. They used to be called “banausics,” and considered barely above slaves, bro.

  28. idealart says:

    ikko, stay away from Nietzsche. HE was a beta. Before you smirk at the murders of American diplomats you might want to find out if they were career or political appointees. There are still some hardworking civil servants (and Marines) in the foreign service who risk their lives for a country composed of spoiled and pampered welfare, affirmative action and quota junkies.

    • ikko says:

      Really that dude Chris Stevens was risking his life for his country? Or was he a treacherous criminal who a year ago abetted a murderous mob that killed Gadafi after a US airstrike–Gadafi who had normalized relations and was a US ally at the time–and the he cheered it on like his boss cunt Hillary Clinton? And the same mob now killed him, in exactly the same way. Poetic justice.

    • Heil Hizzle says:

      Thank you. Adolf Hitler was also a delusional beta. Nazi-ism is basically Harris and Klebold writ large.

      The main problem here, however, isn’t Whiskey’s sexual hangups, but that trying to sound the alarm about Muslims in the alternative right/white nationalists circles will not work, because there is more antipathy for Jews then there is fear of Muslims. If a war between whites and Muslims helps Jews, but non-action from whites harms Jews, then most of the people who frequent these blogs would prefer the latter policy even if they harmed or killed themselves in the process. Think David Duke shaking hands with the Iranian president on Al Jazeera.

      As David Spade said to the agent at the Delta ticketing counter: “Hi, I’m earth. Have we met?”

      • ikko says:

        Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, George Soros, etc., do present very real threats to white people in the US. Ahmadinejad, not so much.

        The US ought to be worried about blacks and hispanics, not about Muslims.

        Why are blacks out of control? Why are there so many hispanics here now? Did Ahmadinejad or Assad do this?

      • idealart says:

        I keep trying to get these jew-obsessed alt-right types to go live in a muslim country for a while. So far, no takers. Maybe ikko will oblige.

      • idealart says:

        Part of the problem though is that Jews bring a lot of grief on themselves. Why do they vote Democrat? That’s suicide these days.

        They vote Democrat because they are more SWPL than Jew. Orthodox vote Republican. Sarah Silverman makes videos for Obama. Case Closed

  29. Van Dussen says:

    Again, some white women are affected by anti-white male fever it really doesn’t infect a critical mass of them. White women get just as aggravated as white men by loudmouth, violent and destructive black sociopath behavior in public. People, whether men or women, naturally gravitate towards people who resemble them in some way. Go to any public high school where white students are the minority. All the white kids are sitting together in the cafeteria. If there was ever an environment for your social theories of white females defecting to the more “dominant” race, this would be it. Yet, the vast majority of white females at these schools date exclusively within the smaller white male population of the school. When the football team turns 100% black, white girls stop cheerleading, setting up for the pep rallies, and even showing up to the games with their supportive homemade signs. That doesn’t mean they lose interest in school sports, they just stick to soccer, cross country, field hockey, lacrosse, softball and they serve as team managers for the sports that are still dominated by white boys. A local 75% black high school won the swimming state championship with a 99% white team. Do you think more of the girls on this team where dating black football players, or other white swimmers and white guys doing another sport? I have witnessed this first hand and can personally attest to the phenomenon.

    Also, why is white music, driven almost exclusively by young white women, currently dominating the charts? Same goes for TV and movies out now. Why are white male celebrities like Ryan Reynolds, Bill Rancic, Scott Disick, Prince William getting so much attention in all the gossip magazines that white women read?

    Maybe it isn’t so black and white as you think. I agree that media and advertising attempts to portray white men as weak, gay, effeminate, uncool and unathletic. Yet too many real people quickly erode this facade. Only the most fanatical feminists among women truly harbor hatred for white American men, and white people in general.

    I made a post on facebook criticizing Obama regarding his handling, or lack thereof, or the embassy attacks and assassinations. Of the 12 people who liked my post, 8 where women, 5 of whom are 30 or under, and 3 which are legitimately hot. Of course all 12 where white. Lots of minorities on my friends list, and not a single one of them liked the post.

    • superdestroyer says:

      The number of high schools that are majority black but have a sizable white population of middle class or upper middle class whites is very small. Such schools usually use tracking so that whites are in majority white classes.

      If you look at a school that has a sizable black population and a large number of poor whites, the poor white girls will integrate themselves into the dominate black culture.

      It is only upper class whites that avoid blacks. Why else do you think that all of the Ivy League universities have the same, small percentage of black students.

    • anon334 says:

      You’re better off ignoring Whiskey’s opinion on race and women, he’s really delusional about this stuff.

    • Conquistador says:

      “People, whether men or women, naturally gravitate towards people who resemble them in some way. Go to any public high school where white students are the minority. All the white kids are sitting together in the cafeteria. If there was ever an environment for your social theories of white females defecting to the more “dominant” race, this would be it. Yet, the vast majority of white females at these schools date exclusively within the smaller white male population of the school.” – Van

      Bullshit. I went to a racially diverse high school. It wasn’t black majority or anything like that as the races were equal in numbers but with whites being vastly outnumbered by non-whites. Most of the white cliques were racially mixed (they had to be just due to numbers) and since high school most of the attractive white females have been impregnated by NAM alphas.

      • Van Dussen says:

        Okay so I guess I should just forget everything I saw, the friends I had, and the girls I dated in high school because you call “bullshit.” I don’t know if you will actually take my perspective at face value, or if you just want to worship the “prowess” of the almighty black alpha, but my school, being less than 20% white at that point (formerly 100% in the early 80s), was 60% black and another 20% Latino. It’s now majority Latino. Maybe my school was different. Almost all of the white kids where high achieving, almost all went to 4 year college, not community college. The hottest white girls played field hockey, soccer, and lacrosse. There just wasn’t really time to get fully involved with the black ghetto element. It was a huge culture class. A shrinking group of preppy and grunge/punk whites being replaced with ultra ghetto, sagging jeans, FUBU blacks. This was an area that initially was almost all middle class white, yet had been inundated with poor section-8 blacks. The school was in the transition of white students moving to private high schools or the one magnet public high school, or moving out of the school district altogether. Of the 3 girls I dated in high school, 1 was at my school, another was in a neighboring school in a similar predicament, and the last one was at a 95% white school in another district. And they were all liberal and ostensibly believed in racial “equality.” My best friend dated one of the teachers daughters. I’m sure some of the white girls dated black or latino guys, but I just can’t think of any in the group of the athlete/high academic achieving group that I was involved with.

      • Conquistador says:

        Where did you go to school? Was it on the west coast or east coast? Inland and rural or metro and urban? These things matter. If you live in fly over country I’m sure what you said is true.

    • sydney carton says:

      And yet white women will vote overwhelmingly for the destruction of white America in November.

      Whiskey is bang on about bitches.

      • Conquistador says:

        Most white guys are in denial about white women. From who they date to their dark psychology. It’s no surprise whiskey comes under so much attack.

      • Van Dussen says:

        In 2008 overall women voted for Obama over McCain 56% to 43%, but white women voted for McCain 53% to 46%. This was an even lower share of white women than Al Gore got in 2000. I doubt this percentage will go up for Obama. If anything, with less young white women voting this year, it might go down.

      • Conquistador says:

        Your figures don’t take into account specific demos. When you say “white women” does that include senior citizen grandmas? Young, single, white, college educated women are major Obama supporters.

    • All I can say is what I saw with my own eyes in the San Gabriel Valley circa 1990-1996. This was majority Hispanic, no Black. It is what I saw. Sample size of Whites = 100, out of perhaps a student body of 3,000. Equally split between male and female.

      Aren’t most of the popular music that White girls like rap? I’ve never encountered a White woman age 15-35 that doesn’t go nuts for rap (older women generally don’t like it). That’s my experience in SoCal.

      • Van Dussen says:

        I’m saying Rap isn’t still viable among white women aged 15-35, just that maybe 5-10 years ago it was the top genre for white women, now it’s number 4 behind pop, alternative pop-rock, and black mainstream pop like Flo Rida. Rap is actually on the verge of outright irrelevance, since electronica/dub-step will basically engulf it or take it or surpass it. The reason rap even rose to prominence from the early 90s-late 2000s was because of the beats were easier to dance too. Go to most late night dance clubs, they are still are playing rap but they are playing a lot more remixed pop songs with electronic beat and a ton of dub-step. Almost all the DJs rising up and releasing albums are white men (David Guetta, Calvin Harris, Skrillex). Either way, at the very top of the Billboard 100 is the whitest it’s been in decades. This is a trend that only began to appear in 2012. I have looked at the charts back to the early 90s and never saw a single week where there weren’t at least 2 black artists in the top 10, and usually there were more. http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100#/charts/hot-100 Of the top 17 songs, Flo Rida is the only black artist at #3. The 16 other songs are released by white artists, 9 are primarily white male artists. White girls age 13-18 absolutely drive the trend for the top of the charts.

        This isn’t to say white women are sticking up for white men out of any sense of principle, just that white male entertainers are even more viable for young white female consumption now than even in the early 90s, and black entertainers are losing their prominence within the white female audience, as well as the entire white audience.

        I understand that there are a number of white women who prefer anything black. It’s important though to make assertions in absolutes, or to look at a certain subset of young white women as representative for the entirety of them. I’m not being delusional, I’m just trying to gain a better sense of the whole picture, both bad and good.

  30. Heil Hizzle says:

    “Why are blacks out of control? Why are there so many hispanics here now? Did Ahmadinejad or Assad do this?”

    No, Teddy Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson did this, with their updating of the immigration and naturalization act. They were two of the most nefarious Jews in America’s long and storied history.

    • ikko says:

      Well Ahmadinejad and Assad certainly didn’t do that, and don’t pose any threat to Americans or Europeans. Whereas American Jewish organizations and certain individuals, which are very influential, have been on the side of open borders and the ACLU and SPLC, Jewish organizations de facto if not de jure, put a lot of pressure on anyone trying to crack down on black violence and criminality. No, the Jews haven’t done this by themselves in the US; but there’s no denying whose side they’re on, and there’s no denying they have power. As far as I know, Shiites and Alawites don’t have power in the US.

      If Israel can’t defend itself, it doesn’t deserve to exist. No country has a “right” to exist. Stop trying to pretend that these men pose a threat to “the West.” They pose a threat to Israel, and Israel should be wished well and allowed to defend itself.

      This question isn’t about Jews or Israel though. It’s about the posters here and Whiskey himself talking about what happened this week in Lybia as if it didn’t have anything to do with America’s treachery against its own ally Gadafi. This didn’t even have anything to do with the movie, it happened on September 11 in Benghazi, long an al Qaeda stronghold. The US gives a country to al Qaeda and is then surprised when al Qaeda treats its ambassador in the predictable way?

      The same mob that killed Gadafi, at the instigation and with the aid of Hillary Clinton and Chris Stevens, killed Chris Stevens. I don’t feel sorry for him, that’s poetic justice.

      The Russians and other sane white people are laughing at American stupidity and arrogance. You want to “bring democracy” to the Muslim world? Don’t be surprised when it blows up in your face and you get dragged through the streets.

      • idealart says:

        I don’t feel sorry for him, that’s poetic justice.

        So, let me get this straight. You make no distinction between career and political appointee? To paraphrase Dan Ackroyd, ikko, you ignorant slut. Do you have any idea what its like for hetero white guys working in the US government? Sensitivity training sessions, quotas, entitled, incompetent idiots who hate your white-privileged guts. If he was career, he probably volunteered but did it for the money. You get paid for an assignment like that. A lot more than one in, say, Geneva. And quite rightly too. I don’t know Steven’s politics but you don’t know either. Incidentally, no one gives a damn how you feel.

      • That’s stupid. Stevens and the two Marines, and former Spec Ops SEAL, and the info officer, and one other guy, were killed NOT by Khadaffi’s men, who long ago left the country on whatever they stole, and cared about him as much as Al Capone’s men cared about him (which was nothing) … rather it was the Muslim Brotherhood. Trying to get the Blind Sheikh freed.

        You don’t get it. Muslims claim they have the ability through violence to make us submit to Sharia. That they will kill us at home and abroad, until we submit. That leaves two choices: fight or submit. That’s a fight we cannot avoid. There is no “sharia lite” where we can have “just a little” Islamic law.

        As far as Ahmadinejad, he’s a threat to the US because he and Russia want to control the Gulf and take that away from the US Navy. Which has been US policy since FDR. So we set the global supply and price of oil. Like living a decent life in a nice safe place?

        THAT rests on cheap oil. Which depends on keeping nukes out of Iran’s hands. Which explains why Russia is intent on nuking up Iran. Its a cheap play to raise the price of oil so Putin can stay in power. The FT did some calcs, his current, not planned, budget requires oil at $118 to break even.

        America, until (twenty years on) we can develop our own oil resources needs control of the Gulf and no nukes there. We don’t have a margin. Unless you’d like to contemplate all those EBT cards not working because the economy and dollar crashed, and stores refuse to honor them.

      • ikko2 says:

        Whiskey, that’s exactly my point. Gadafi was fighting the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda. He was US ally. The US stabbed him in the back and put the MB in power. This ambassador was part of that. Now the people he put in power, and who he treacherously helped kill our own ally, kill him too in the same way. Poetic justice.

        Long live Russia and Putin, they’re the only ones standing in the way of international US madness. The US goes around the world helping Sunni Islam everywhere and promoting feminism and gay rights. Fkcuk the US, long live Putin. How can you be a conservative and support US foreign policy? It’s insane.

        Stop it with the sharia and Muslims. They want to live under sharia in their own countries. I say, let them do that and fuck goats. Why do you care? It’s not true that they want to impose sharia in the US, this is propaganda. They want to live under Muslim law themselves, and that’s their business. The US doesn’t need to get involved in these conflicts, let them kill each other. Muslim countries are weak. They’re not invading the US or Europe wtih 100 tank divisions. If you want to stop terrorism, how about some stronger immigration/profiling laws? That’s all that’s needed.

        The US *should* get out of the Persian Gulf. If the Chinese and Russians want a piece of that, let them do it. The US has plenty of oil reserves it could develop at home. And the price of oil is set at global levels btw.

    • fakeemail says:

      They weren’t Jews, buddy boys. And don’t tell me they were pawns of the Jews. These white guys (alpha slime) were big boys and own their actions.

  31. Sgt. Joe Friday says:

    Look, as they say, anything that cannot go on forever won’t. Not even – or maybe especially – great countries.

    The sun never sets on the British empire, it was said. Nixon and Kissinger thought the USSR was a permanent entity. What happened to both? It can and will happen to the USA, count on it.

    I don’t agree with everything the host of this blog has to say, but he makes some good points, albeit with a blunt instrument. A free, capitalistic, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural society is an oxymoron. It has never existed, anywhere, anytime.

    It is a foregone conclusion that the USA will break up into several smaller nation-states. Whether that is a peaceful or violent event, and whether it takes place quickly or gradually is in question. But it’s going to happen. Guaranteed.

    • ikko says:

      Didn’t happen in Brazil, don’t see why it would happen in the US.

      What is more likely is that the US will “decline” slowly, over the course of a century or more. There won’t be any implosion, just a decline to mediocrity.

      I would like to see an implosion happen faster, before the US is able to do more damage to Europe and to go around the world spreading “democracy,” gay rights, feminism, etc., which Whiskey seems to support.

      • idealart says:

        spreading “democracy,” gay rights, feminism, etc., which Whiskey seems to support.

        Where does he say he supports gay rights or feminism?

        Europe doesn’t need American help destroying itself. Its doing fine all on its own. Liberalism originated in Europe if you’ll recall.

      • idealart says:

        And by liberalism I mean the modern atheist kind.

  32. idealart says:

    I agree with some other posters here about white women. I’m not so sure they’re going to be too keen on Islam. I have seen how they respond to blacks in Washington, DC. Very hard-left feminists. They hate and fear ’em. Oh, they use their feminist rhetoric about “reaching out” and “conflict management”.

    The only way to stop liberal madness is to get as many liberals near muslims (and blacks) as possible. Every day, on the streets. Yes, they’ll still want the goodies but it gets hard, very hard, for them to believe in liberal pieties such as blank slate and victimization. Especially women.

  33. idealart says:

    There are officially defined levels of postings. It is now reported that the American ambassador in Cairo, an Obama appointee, ordered the Marines not arm themselves. In other words, she prevented them from defending themselves and American diplomats in a designated “dangerous or hardship duty” post. If this is true, she could face criminal charges. Was she ordered to do so by Clinton? Was Clinton ordered by Obama? Was the same disregard for security practiced in Libya?

  34. Lorne says:

    Whiskey, your posts are usually pretty good, but this one is about half nonsense. The U.S. is constantly stirring the Arabs up and messing with them, and we are supposed to be surprised and outraged when the Arabs go batshit crazy? I’m sure this was planned, to the extent Arabs plan anything, but so what? Frankly, anytime a Federal gummit employee gets it, I have to laugh. It’s one less parasite who won’t be around to draw that fat pension.

  35. anon334 says:

    The Muslim population of the US is very small and it will always be small. How exactly is Sharia law going to be enforced by 1% of the population? Come on, Whiskey.

    • idealart says:

      Simple. Obama has already taken the same logic used by civil rights and hate crime laws. They say, we (non-muslims) are not allowed to offend Allah. This is blasphemy. Doesn’t matter you’re not a muslim. Think about it. Americans are weak and confused. They don’t believe in much anymore and will cave after a riot or two, or even a George Zimmerman, same as they did in the 60s.

    • By violence at home and abroad. Already Muslims UNLIKE SCIENTOLIGISTS or Christians or JEWS got South Park episodes pulled and banned. Never to appear again on TV, my understanding banned also from the Web and from DVD releases.

      Think about that. Under threat of violence, South Park and Comedy Central and the studios and the creators caved. Like a wet noodle.

      When the Chair of the Joint Chiefs calls and asks for you to submit to Sharia (what he asked, basically), that’s the path to Sharia. When MSNBC, and academics, argue we hae to give up the First Amendment and free speech because Muslims get angry, then that’s the path to Sharia. You don’t go “halfway.” You don’t get off at one stop. Its an express train straight to Saudi Arabia or Egypt or Pakistan.

      • ikko2 says:

        So the solution to South Park getting scared is to send Marines to the hills of Yemen and the Hindu Kush to force gay rights and “democracy” on those savages?

    • fakeemail says:

      Mexican population used to be pretty small too. . .

  36. Heil Hizzle says:

    One advantage the Jews seem to have over most of the posters here, is that they have very long memories. I like a lot of things about Pat Buchanan, and I like a lot of things about Ron Paul. But the world, and certainly not Machiavellian Muslims, run on the golden rule. I agree we should scale back our intervention, but if we just “leave them alone” I don’t believe they’re just going to reciprocate.

    At the beginning of the 20th century, the Ottoman Empire was known as “the sick man of Europe.” But before that the Muslim empire stretched from Mecca and Medina all the way into Vienna, where they finally got beaten back. It’s a good thing that the knights during the Crusades didn’t just drop their lances before going into battle, because they had all reasoned with each other that “we’re just doing this for the Jews.”

    No, I don’t think we should go the cowboy route, the “my country right or wrong” route, the super patriotic songs and the SCUD missiles route, but this problem is spreading. Western Europe and Scandinavia are being strangled by the Muslim incursions.

    A grossly disproportionate number of powerful lobbyists, journalists, and politicians, who are Jewish are lobbying for the invading swarms in Western Europe and North America. Their rationale is that: “if we can dilute the number of white gentiles, then we won’t have to worry about another Holocaust.” That their new emigres might hate them just as much or more, doesn’t seem to cross their minds, because, as they say, generals always fight the last war.

    But saying that a lot of Jews are involved in this, is not quite the same is saying “it’s all the jooz.” You might as well be a black guy at that point, talking about “the man.”

    Even Kevin MacDonald, the alleged “Marx of the anti-Semites,” does not believe in the single causation of Jews. There are a lot of strains of Protestant Christianity, whose theology of original sin, and Calvinists self-loathing, easily morphed into white guilt, and a desire for self annihilation.

    Look at Chris Matthews, or Ted Kennedy, or Lyndon Johnson, or Joe Biden, or George Bush, who was an open borders fanatic, as was Ronald Reagan. Jews are there, but they are as always diligent servants of power. There is not a one to one correlation between power and money, either. Especially not where Jews are concerned. A journalists who makes low six figures at the New York Times, has more power among Jews and shaping the perceptions of the general population, than a stockbroker who makes 10 times as much. But the real source of power right now, is still the same one as always, it is the Eastern elites like the Kennedys, who also have very long memories. Bobby Kennedy was humiliated and thwarted by the working class force of nature that was Jimmy Hoffa. Corruption eventually did Hoffa in, but the important lesson for the elites was that white working-class people should never be given real political power, as they posed a threat to the Eastern white elites.

    Most of what looks like a racial struggle, a religious struggle, is really a struggle between two groups of white people. And I know that’s a bummer to people who think Jews knock down the twin towers and ate their homework, but there it is.

    • idealart says:

      Thanks for your thoughtful post. Its interesting that Jews (maybe they’re liberalized?) can’t see Islam as worse than Euros.

      I think I see what you’re saying about original sin and guilt. But, if Christians didn’t believe in original sin (don’t Jews also?) wouldn’t there be paganism? Pagans wouldn’t hesitate to kill Jews too, not only muslims. You could say Hitler was pagan. What Christianity used to have was an identification with Christ as the sacrificial victim that breaks the unending cycle of revenge. If the West loses this and reverts to a new kind of gnosticism there could be violence overflow and a return to a revenge culture.

    • ikko2 says:

      Not only didn’t the knights not drop their lances, they killed Jews. Jews were allied with Muslims at that time (and throughout history btw; their recent enmity is…recent).

      Why do you keep talking about a Muslim “invasion” of Europe? Did I miss something and Muslims invaded with 100 tank divisions? Why are they there? Last I checked, it was Europeans inviting them in. And I don’t mean Jews, in that case it isn’t. But your enemy isn’t the Muslims, it’s the kinds of Europeans who invited them in. Europeans supported by American occupation troops by the way.

      The US embassy in France and other parts of Europe aggressively promotes Muslim immigration and attacks “nativist” parties.

      • Van Dussen says:

        Special amendments need to be made to permanently ban the practice or belief in Islam from all Western countries. People need to stand up once and for all and make being a member of Islam akin to being a member of Al-Quaida itself. Islam was founded by a terrorist. All moderate Muslims should be shamed into denying they are even a member of such a violent, lunatic political ideology.

      • ikko3 says:

        I agree, but not just Muslims. All third world immigrants need to be deported from Europe. This should be whether or not they are Muslim, secular, or even Christian. They belong in their own countries, not in Europe.

  37. Conquistador says:

    If you guys don’t like what Whiskey has to say then buzz off. If you want the usual run of the mill analysis go to the ten million other blogs that do that. You know what you get when you read Whiskey’s work and I for one like the points he raises. He knows how to connect the dots and what he says is absolutely true.

    My own sister who attends an elite school with lots of ties to the foreign service doesn’t give a shit about this at all. Neither does any other chick I know on facebook or real life. What Whiskey says is pretty accurate if you spend any time around women.

  38. Robert in Arabia says:

    Even if one is to assume that at least one member of the free and open Western media is truly a journalist you’d think, at least once maybe, that they’d include the following quote in one of the main news mediums [TV or jewspapers] made by Osama Bin Laden himself after the Sept 11th attacks.

    You’d don’t need to be Hercule fucking Poirot to extract one or two clues from this:
    “I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. … The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.”

    http://www.public-action.com/911/oblintrv.html

  39. Robert in Arabia says:

    911 in 5 minutes.

  40. Pingback: Linkage Is Good For You: Truncated Moving Week | Society of Amateur Gentlemen

  41. whatever says:

    Rich people need me to protect their outsourced factory in Libya? I suggest they “go Galt”. They explain the NAP to the Libyans, and I’m sure, even after being bombed by the rich people’s lackeys for months, they will understand that the Western Elite is just like them, and not hurt them anymore.

    Me? Why would I protect the rich American’s assets? They have made it quite clear how they feel about me.

  42. asdf says:

    Islam may deserve to win. It’s that bad over here. Whatever potential we have, if we won’t use it, it might as well not exist.

  43. Conquistador says:

    Agreed. White guys can’t even subdue their idiotic women. How will they overcome the barbarian hordes?

Comments are closed.