The Fox News report here shows that other people are questioning Obama’s turnout and vote totals.
As the Philadelphia Inquirer first reported last week, six of Philadelphia’s 66 wards handed the president victory shares of 99 percent or better. In 20 of the wards, the Obama vote totals exceeded 97 percent.
On Monday, the Inquirer reported that in 59 of Philadelphia’s “divisions” — these are subsets of wards, wherein fewer than 1,000 people might be registered to vote — GOP nominee Mitt Romney failed to win even a single vote. Collectively, the votes for Obama across these divisions added up to 19,605, to Romney’s zero.
However, Barone noted that turnout rates in these areas was sometimes reported to have exceeded 90 percent, a level of enthusiasm that he said should arouse suspicion. “Philadelphia’s been a place that’s had some pretty irregular election procedures in the past,” he said.
State Rep. Sam Smith, the Republican from the 66th District who serves as speaker of the Pennsylvania House, called the results “questionable.” “In some precincts in Philadelphia, I think you’re going to see, as they finish the official count, places where there are more people voting in a precinct than actually signed in at the poll book,” Smith told Fox News.
Asked what gave him that idea, Smith cited the electoral history of the city and said he thought it would be “predictive” this time around, as well.
Turnout for Obama was 10 million votes south of his 2008 total. So obviously there was massive fraud. Even in Black areas, there would be SOME votes for Romney, from gentrifiers, and a few Black outliers. Romney got NONE. NONE. It doesn’t make sense. Save fraud.